<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>San Francisco Metblogs &#187; signs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.metblogs.com/tag/signs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.metblogs.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:59:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, it&#8217;s an election</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/03/hey-its-an-election/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/03/hey-its-an-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenderloin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=6265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s election day! Who knew? In San Francisco, the only interesting thing on the ballot is Prop. D., the proposal to put giant Times Square-type advertising signs on Market Street in order to &#8220;enliven&#8221; it. Are they kidding? Apparently not. Here are some arguments in favor and a Chronicle editorial against. And here is the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/laughingsquid/383433646/"><img src="http://sf.metblogs.com/files/2009/11/times_square-300x199.jpg" alt="times_square" width="300" height="199" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6266" /></a>It&#8217;s election day! Who knew? In San Francisco, the only interesting thing on the ballot is Prop. D., the <a HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/us/03billboard.html" target="_window">proposal to put giant Times Square-type advertising signs on Market Street</a> in order to &#8220;enliven&#8221; it. </p>
<p>Are they kidding? Apparently not. Here are some <a hREF="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/27/ED3H1ABCJF.DTL" target="_window">arguments in favor</a> and a <a hREF="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/27/EDB81ABBE1.DTL" target="_window">Chronicle editorial against</a>. And here is <a HREF="http://sfelections.org/vip/" target="_window">the whole list</a> of issues and candidates running, including City Atty. Dennis Herrera (unopposed).</p>
<p>Go to the <a hREF="http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_page.asp?id=92588" target="_window">SF Dept of Elections</a> for results tonight.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br /><i><a hREF="http://www.flickr.com/photos/laughingsquid/383433646/" target="_window">Flickr photo</a> of Times Square by Scott Beale at <a hREF="http://www.flickr.com/photos/laughingsquid/" target="_window">Laughing Squid</a>. </i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/03/hey-its-an-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City changing street sign style</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/05/12/city-changing-street-sign-style/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/05/12/city-changing-street-sign-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic signs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/05/12/city-changing-street-sign-style/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been noticing the ugly new street signs around town for the last year or two, but this was the first chance I had to actually compare the old style (top) with the new style (bottom). It&#8217;s not just that the new font is ugly; it&#8217;s that the text is not even centered. And I&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been noticing the ugly new street signs around town for the last year or two, but this was the first chance I had to actually compare the old style (top) with the new style (bottom).</p>
<p><img src="http://img.metblogs.com/sf/files/2008/05/streetsign_old.jpg" alt="San Francisco street sign, old style" align="middle" hspace="0" vspace="15" /><br />
<img src="http://img.metblogs.com/sf/files/2008/05/streetsign_new.jpg" alt="San Francisco street sign, new style" align="middle" hspace="0" vspace="15" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just that the new font is ugly; it&#8217;s that the text is not even centered. And I&#8217;ve seen that on other new-style signs too. What&#8217;s up with that? <br />&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/05/12/city-changing-street-sign-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

