<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>San Francisco Metblogs &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.metblogs.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.metblogs.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:59:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google still leaves much of southeast SF from Street View</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/08/18/google-still-leaves-much-of-southeast-sf-from-street-view/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/08/18/google-still-leaves-much-of-southeast-sf-from-street-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bernal Heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Street View]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=6005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although San Francisco was one of the first cities to have Google&#8217;s camera-equipped cars tootling up and down its streets to produce Street View imagery, the service has never been very good for the southeast part of the city. With yesterday&#8217;s update to the service, several neighborhoods, including much of Bernal Heights and Visitacion Valley, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although San Francisco was one of the first cities to have Google&#8217;s camera-equipped cars tootling up and down its streets to produce Street View imagery, the service has never been very good for the southeast part of the city. With <a href="http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2009/08/wait-is-over-new-street-view-imagery.html" target="_window">yesterday&#8217;s update to the service</a>, several neighborhoods, including much of Bernal Heights and Visitacion Valley, still lack coverage. Here&#8217;s Bernal Heights:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.toobeautiful.org/SF_street_view_southeast.gif"><img src="http://sf.metblogs.com/files/2009/08/SF_street_view_bernal-300x233.gif" alt="SF_street_view_bernal" width="300" height="233" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-6007" /></a></p>
<p>As a Bernal Heights resident whose block is not covered, I have mixed feelings about being left out. Should I feel exclusive, or excluded? At least it&#8217;s an improvement over the <a HREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2007/06/03/sf-stops-at-cesar-chavez/" target="_window">original coverage</a> which showed only half the city. </p>
<p>Click the image above for an image that shows the southeastern quadrant of the city, where coverage is lacking.</p>
<p>Previously: <br />
<a HREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2007/06/03/sf-stops-at-cesar-chavez/" target="_window">SF stops at Cesar Chavez?</a> <br />
<a hREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/01/14/google-now-displays-bart-caltrain-lines/" target="_window">Google maps now displays BART, Caltrain lines</a> <br />
<a HREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/06/03/petition-for-google-to-add-bike-routes-to-maps/" target="_window">Petition to have bike routes on Google maps</a> <br />
<a hREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2007/07/16/fun-with-google-maps/" target="_window">Fun with Google maps</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/08/18/google-still-leaves-much-of-southeast-sf-from-street-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Joaquin trains now on Google Transit</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/08/06/san-joaquin-trains-now-on-google-transit/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/08/06/san-joaquin-trains-now-on-google-transit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bakersfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=5918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtesy Jackson West, this post on the Trillium Solutions blog: Amtrak&#8217;s San Joaquin trains, which run between San Jose, Martinez, and Bakersfield, are now in the Google Transit system. That means you can see them listed among mass transit options when planning your trip to the Buck Owens Crystal Palace or to see the awesome [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=Amtrak/am2Route/Vertical_Route_Page&#38;c=am2Route&#38;cid=1081442673773"><img src="http://sf.metblogs.com/files/2009/08/san_joaquin_route.gif" alt="san_joaquin_route" width="172" height="240" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5919" /></a>Courtesy <a hrEF="http://jacksonwest.wordpress.com/" target="_window">Jackson West</a>, this post on the <a hREF="http://www.trilliumtransit.com/blog/2009/08/05/amtrak-services-in-google-transit/" target="_window">Trillium Solutions blog</a>: Amtrak&#8217;s San Joaquin trains, which run between San Jose, Martinez, and Bakersfield, are now in the Google Transit system. </p>
<p>That means you can see them listed among mass transit options when planning your trip to the <a HREF="http://www.buckowens.com/museum.html" target="_window">Buck Owens Crystal Palace</a> or to see the awesome classic neon signs that <a hrEF="http://is.gd/25jFO" target="_window">Thomas Hawk recently blogged about</a>.</p>
<p>I said when <i>planning</i> your trip. It&#8217;s Amtrak, you know, so don&#8217;t time things too closely. That said, the Capitol Corridor and San Joaquin trains are said to be among the best in on-time performance. </p>
<p>Trains near LA, Chicago and New York City have also been added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/08/06/san-joaquin-trains-now-on-google-transit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have you seen them?</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/03/01/have-you-seen-them/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/03/01/have-you-seen-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South of Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenderloin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wondercon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=5479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wondercon sci-fi fan conference is finishing up at Moscone. Here are Flickr photos from the shindig, all of them seemingly &#8220;All Rights Reserved.&#8221; The New York Times today has a feature on Google&#8217;s Marissa Mayer, &#8220;employee number 20&#8243; and first female engineer at the software candyland. Oh wait, it&#8217;s just another corporation, I keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a hREF="http://www.comic-con.org/" target="_window">Wondercon</a> sci-fi fan conference <a hREF="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/28/BAK616755I.DTL" target="_window">is finishing up at Moscone</a>. Here are <a HREF="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/wondercon/" target="_window">Flickr photos</a> from the shindig, all of them seemingly &#8220;All Rights Reserved.&#8221;</p>
<p>The New York Times today has a feature on <a hREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/business/01marissa.html" target="_window">Google&#8217;s Marissa Mayer</a>, &#8220;employee number 20&#8243; and first female engineer at the software candyland. Oh wait, it&#8217;s <a HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/technology/internet/18google.html" target="_window">just</a> <a HREF="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/" target="_window">another</a> <a HREF="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article5678595.ece" target="_window">corporation</a>, I keep forgetting.</p>
<p>A Chronicle editorial says one out of three &#8220;massage&#8221; establishments is a <a hREF="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/28/ED7S1648OE.DTL" target="_window">brothel</a>. Really? Only one out of three? Geez, I&#8217;ll bet it&#8217;s a pain in the ass to work at the other two-thirds and have men coming in all the time with the wrong idea. Shouldn&#8217;t they have some sort of identifying sign that means &#8220;Not that kind of massage place, really&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/03/01/have-you-seen-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google now displays BART, Caltrain lines</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/01/14/google-now-displays-bart-caltrain-lines/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/01/14/google-now-displays-bart-caltrain-lines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BART]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=5136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw this first on Curbed SF &#8212; Google maps now displays color-coded BART lines, along with the Caltrain line. Apparently the San Francisco Bay Area is the first metropolitan region to get this feature. Click the thumbnail to go to Google maps and see the BART and Caltrain lines (the latter being the grey line [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://is.gd/fTcb" target="_window"><img src="http://img.metblogs.com/sf/files/2009/01/bart_lines_on_google-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-5137" /></a>Saw this first on <a hREF="http://sf.curbed.com/archives/2009/01/14/fun_with_maps_google_loves_you_edition.php" target="_window">Curbed SF</a> &#8212; Google maps <a hREF="http://is.gd/fTcb" target="_window">now displays color-coded BART lines</a>, along with the Caltrain line. Apparently the San Francisco Bay Area is the first metropolitan region to get this feature. Click the thumbnail to go to Google maps and see the BART and Caltrain lines (the latter being the grey line going down the Peninsula, of course).</p>
<p>However, the feature only displays a straight-line route map from station to station, often distorting the actual location of the route taken between stations. </p>
<p><span id="more-5136"></span><br />
<a href="http://is.gd/fTjh"><img src="http://img.metblogs.com/sf/files/2009/01/actual_tracks1.jpg" alt="" width="434" height="450" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5140" /></a></p>
<p>Click the image to see it on Google maps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/01/14/google-now-displays-bart-caltrain-lines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

