<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>San Francisco Metblogs &#187; Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sf.metblogs.com/category/development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf.metblogs.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='sf.metblogs.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>At the Roxie: &#8216;Ready, Set, Bag!&#8217; benefit for SF Food Bank</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/19/at-the-roxie-ready-set-bag-benefit-for-sf-food-bank/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/19/at-the-roxie-ready-set-bag-benefit-for-sf-food-bank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roxie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=6299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The film &#8220;Ready, Set, Bag!&#8221; (formerly titled &#8220;Paper or Plastic?&#8220;) will be shown tonight at the Roxie Theatre in a benefit for the San Francisco Food Bank, the city&#8217;s non-profit group that helps feed thousands of families every week using groceries and produce donated by stores and growers. The program starts at 7:00 pm.
The film [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The film &#8220;<a hREF="http://www.readysetbag.com/" target="_window">Ready, Set, Bag!</a>&#8221; (formerly titled &#8220;<a href="http://austinist.com/2008/10/09/aff_preview_paper_or_plastic.php" target="_window">Paper or Plastic?</a>&#8220;) will be shown tonight at the Roxie Theatre in a benefit for the <a HREF="http://www.sffoodbank.org/index.html" target="_window">San Francisco Food Bank</a>, the city&#8217;s non-profit group that helps feed thousands of families every week using groceries and produce donated by stores and growers. The program starts at 7:00 pm.</p>
<p>The film follows the finalists in the National Grocers Association <a HREF="http://www.nationalgrocers.org/SpecialPrograms/BestBagger.html" target="_window">Best Bagger Championship</a>, which is exactly what it sounds like, I guess. Also on the program is a short, <a HREF="http://www.cartoonbrew.com/shorts/capobiancos-leonardo-begins-screening.html" target="_window">Leonardo</a>, by Pixar animator Jim Capobianco.</p>
<p>Speaking of the Food Bank, VISA is doubling donations to the group right now. So <a href="https://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5420/t/7842/shop/custom.jsp?donate_page_KEY=1365" target="_window">go to their website</a> and give &#8216;em some money. The Food Bank is a great community organization. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/19/at-the-roxie-ready-set-bag-benefit-for-sf-food-bank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The cost of living in the Bay Area</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/06/the-cost-of-living-in-the-bay-area/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/06/the-cost-of-living-in-the-bay-area/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=6277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A liberal think tank, the Urban Land Institute, has issued a report on the cost to working people of living in the Bay Area. The report, Bay Area Burden, examines the impact on working people of high costs of housing and transportation, looks at how proximity to mass transit helps relieve the burden, and asks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://sf.metblogs.com/files/2009/11/urban_land_institute_logo.gif" alt="urban_land_institute_logo" width="189" height="69" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6278" />A liberal think tank, the Urban Land Institute, has issued a report on the cost to working people of living in the Bay Area. The report, <a hREF="http://bayareaburden.org/the-report/" target="_window">Bay Area Burden</a>, examines the impact on working people of high costs of housing and transportation, looks at how proximity to mass transit helps relieve the burden, and asks policymakers to take working people&#8217;s needs into account when making land use decisions.</p>
<p>Their website, <a hREF="http://bayareaburden.org/" target="_window">bayareaburden.org</a>, has a <a href="http://bayareaburden.org/calculator/" target="_window">Housing + Transportation Calculator</a> that&#8217;s fun to play with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/06/the-cost-of-living-in-the-bay-area/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, it&#8217;s an election</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/03/hey-its-an-election/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/03/hey-its-an-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenderloin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=6265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s election day! Who knew? In San Francisco, the only interesting thing on the ballot is Prop. D., the proposal to put giant Times Square-type advertising signs on Market Street in order to &#8220;enliven&#8221; it. 
Are they kidding? Apparently not. Here are some arguments in favor and a Chronicle editorial against. And here is the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/laughingsquid/383433646/"><img src="http://sf.metblogs.com/files/2009/11/times_square-300x199.jpg" alt="times_square" width="300" height="199" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6266" /></a>It&#8217;s election day! Who knew? In San Francisco, the only interesting thing on the ballot is Prop. D., the <a HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/us/03billboard.html" target="_window">proposal to put giant Times Square-type advertising signs on Market Street</a> in order to &#8220;enliven&#8221; it. </p>
<p>Are they kidding? Apparently not. Here are some <a hREF="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/27/ED3H1ABCJF.DTL" target="_window">arguments in favor</a> and a <a hREF="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/27/EDB81ABBE1.DTL" target="_window">Chronicle editorial against</a>. And here is <a HREF="http://sfelections.org/vip/" target="_window">the whole list</a> of issues and candidates running, including City Atty. Dennis Herrera (unopposed).</p>
<p>Go to the <a hREF="http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_page.asp?id=92588" target="_window">SF Dept of Elections</a> for results tonight.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br /><i><a hREF="http://www.flickr.com/photos/laughingsquid/383433646/" target="_window">Flickr photo</a> of Times Square by Scott Beale at <a hREF="http://www.flickr.com/photos/laughingsquid/" target="_window">Laughing Squid</a>. </i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/11/03/hey-its-an-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cathedral Hill Hotel to become hospital</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/09/17/cathedral-hill-hotel-to-become-hospital/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/09/17/cathedral-hill-hotel-to-become-hospital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cathedral Hill Hotel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Tar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=6088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#160; &#160; &#160; Gene Hackman as Harry Caul monitoring the goings-on in the Jack Tar Hotel
I was shocked to see this Curbed SF story on the proposed conversion of San Francisco&#8217;s Cathedral Hill Hotel to a hospital by the octopus-like California Pacific Medical Center. I don&#8217;t know about you, but the first thing I think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://sf.metblogs.com/files/2009/09/The-Conversation-499x281.jpg" alt="The-Conversation" width="499" height="281" /><br />
<font size="-1"><i>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Gene Hackman as Harry Caul monitoring the goings-on in the Jack Tar Hotel</i></p>
<p>I was shocked to see this <a HREF="http://sf.curbed.com/archives/2009/09/17/cathedral_hill_hotel_will_be_a_hospital_in_5_years.php" target="_window">Curbed SF story</a> on the proposed conversion of San Francisco&#8217;s Cathedral Hill Hotel to a hospital by the octopus-like California Pacific Medical Center. I don&#8217;t know about you, but the first thing I think about whenever I pass that hotel is that part of the great Coppolla film <a hREF="http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/cteq/01/13/conversation.html" target="_window">The Conversation</a> (1974) was filmed there when it was known as the Jack Tar Hotel. (Part of it was also filmed at the Embarcadero Center, and somehow that office complex does not evoke the same associations.)</p>
<p>A personal memory I have of that hotel is the 1990 and 1991 Out/Write conferences, which brought together the whole LGBT literary world for the first time. Searching for some mention of these conferences on the web, I found a <a hREF="http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/09/14/reviews/24032.html" target="_window">lovely piece by Edmund White</a>, in which he gives a glowing description of the 1991 conference. </font></p>
<p><b><i>Also read: </i></b><a HREF="http://sf.curbed.com/archives/2009/09/18/once_upon_a_time_jack_tar_hotel_showed_us_how_it_was_done.php" target="_window">Curbed SF on the Jack Tar Hotel</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/09/17/cathedral-hill-hotel-to-become-hospital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Lapse of Bridge Being Built</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/09/10/time-lapse-of-bridge-being-built/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/09/10/time-lapse-of-bridge-being-built/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downtown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=6082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who knows how to post YouTubes on Metblogs (tips welcome), but here is a time lapse of the bridge being built!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knows how to post YouTubes on Metblogs (tips welcome), but here is<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTM6Ux8Viak"> a time lapse of the bridge being built</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/09/10/time-lapse-of-bridge-being-built/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High speed rail contract put off</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/09/03/high-speed-rail-contract-put-off/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/09/03/high-speed-rail-contract-put-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullet train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high speed rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schwartzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=6039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California&#8217;s High Speed Rail Authority delayed a vote to award a $9 million public relations contract when some commission members let it be known that the contract was about to be awarded to some cronies of Gov. Arnold Schwartzenegger, and that two of the three commission members who recommended the PR firm used to work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://sf.metblogs.com/files/2009/09/train_wreck.jpg" alt="train_wreck" width="149" height="220" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6040" />California&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/">High Speed Rail Authority</a> <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/09/rail-board-puts-off-vote-to-award-9-million-contract-.html" target="_window">delayed a vote</a> to award a $9 million public relations contract when some commission members let it be known that the contract was about to be awarded to some cronies of Gov. Arnold Schwartzenegger, and that two of the three commission members who recommended the PR firm used to work with one of its principals. </p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t Schwartzenegger elected by promising <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/capitolandcalifornia/story/2048766.html">not to do business as usual</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/09/03/high-speed-rail-contract-put-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google still leaves much of southeast SF from Street View</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/08/18/google-still-leaves-much-of-southeast-sf-from-street-view/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/08/18/google-still-leaves-much-of-southeast-sf-from-street-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bernal Heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Street View]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=6005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although San Francisco was one of the first cities to have Google&#8217;s camera-equipped cars tootling up and down its streets to produce Street View imagery, the service has never been very good for the southeast part of the city. With yesterday&#8217;s update to the service, several neighborhoods, including much of Bernal Heights and Visitacion Valley, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although San Francisco was one of the first cities to have Google&#8217;s camera-equipped cars tootling up and down its streets to produce Street View imagery, the service has never been very good for the southeast part of the city. With <a href="http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2009/08/wait-is-over-new-street-view-imagery.html" target="_window">yesterday&#8217;s update to the service</a>, several neighborhoods, including much of Bernal Heights and Visitacion Valley, still lack coverage. Here&#8217;s Bernal Heights:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.toobeautiful.org/SF_street_view_southeast.gif"><img src="http://sf.metblogs.com/files/2009/08/SF_street_view_bernal-300x233.gif" alt="SF_street_view_bernal" width="300" height="233" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-6007" /></a></p>
<p>As a Bernal Heights resident whose block is not covered, I have mixed feelings about being left out. Should I feel exclusive, or excluded? At least it&#8217;s an improvement over the <a HREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2007/06/03/sf-stops-at-cesar-chavez/" target="_window">original coverage</a> which showed only half the city. </p>
<p>Click the image above for an image that shows the southeastern quadrant of the city, where coverage is lacking.</p>
<p>Previously: <br />
<a HREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2007/06/03/sf-stops-at-cesar-chavez/" target="_window">SF stops at Cesar Chavez?</a> <br />
<a hREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/01/14/google-now-displays-bart-caltrain-lines/" target="_window">Google maps now displays BART, Caltrain lines</a> <br />
<a HREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/06/03/petition-for-google-to-add-bike-routes-to-maps/" target="_window">Petition to have bike routes on Google maps</a> <br />
<a hREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2007/07/16/fun-with-google-maps/" target="_window">Fun with Google maps</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/08/18/google-still-leaves-much-of-southeast-sf-from-street-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Noe Valley&#8217;s Bell Market closing Sunday</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/02/10/noe-valleys-bell-market-closing-sunday/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/02/10/noe-valleys-bell-market-closing-sunday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noe Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groceries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supermarkets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Foods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=5345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bell Market in Noe Valley is set to close at 4:00 pm on Sunday, Feb. 15, according to signs posted on the store. I went in there last night to buy some baby food (for the cat &#8212; I don&#8217;t have any babies) and they were totally out of what I wanted. A look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bell Market in Noe Valley is set to close at 4:00 pm on Sunday, Feb. 15, according to signs posted on the store. I went in there last night to buy some baby food (for the cat &#8212; I don&#8217;t have any babies) and they were totally out of what I wanted. A look around the store revealed that many shelves were already bare, with empty banana cartons lining the empty bottom shelves.</p>
<p>Curbed SF has been saying that Whole Foods is taking over the location. Their <a hREF="http://sf.curbed.com/archives/2009/02/03/nothing_special_for_noes_whole_foods.php" target="_window">most recent post</a> on the matter says the location is expected to open in the fall, leaving more than six months for renovation to take place. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/02/10/noe-valleys-bell-market-closing-sunday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planning Commission denies permit to American Apparel</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/02/05/planning-commission-denies-permit-to-amap/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/02/05/planning-commission-denies-permit-to-amap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Apparel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mission District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sfStreets_Valencia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Elliott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valencia St.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=5326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less than a month after local writer-activist Stephen Elliott began organizing a campaign against a proposed American Apparel store on Valencia St., the San Francisco Planning Commission denied a permit to the controversial clothing manufacturer-retailer. 
The vote by the commission was 7-0, the Stop American Apparel website reported.
Update:  Elliott, who was in New York [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less than a month after local writer-activist Stephen Elliott <a HREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/01/19/chain-stores-on-valencia-nfw-says-writer-activist/" target="_window">began organizing a campaign against</a> a proposed American Apparel store on Valencia St., the San Francisco Planning Commission <a HREF="http://stopamericanapparel.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/you-won/" target="_window">denied a permit</a> to the <a hREF="http://www.radaronline.com/features/2008/03/american_apparel_defense_of_dov_charney_01.php" target="_window">controversial</a> clothing manufacturer-retailer. </p>
<p>The vote by the commission was 7-0, the <a HREF="http://stopamericanapparel.wordpress.com/" target="_window">Stop American Apparel website</a> reported.</p>
<p><b>Update: </b> Elliott, who was in New York last night promoting his new online magazine <a hREF="http://therumpus.net" target="_window">The Rumpus</a>, <a hREF="http://therumpus.net/2009/02/the-editors-desk-about-last-night/" target="_window">blogged</a> about the commission&#8217;s vote and his efforts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/02/05/planning-commission-denies-permit-to-amap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public transportation 2.1</title>
		<link>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/02/01/public-transportation-21/</link>
		<comments>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/02/01/public-transportation-21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pritchard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BART]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bicycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caltrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MUNI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenderloin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sf.metblogs.com/?p=5246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was inspired by Tara&#8217;s post, Public Transportation 2.0, to add more than a comment. 
When I was in Bangalore in 2007, I was struck by the utility of the ubiquitous motorized rickshaws, known locally as autocabs or just autos:  

Any visitor to Asia has seen these things, since they&#8217;re in every Asian city. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was inspired by <a href="http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/01/31/public-transportation-20/">Tara&#8217;s post, Public Transportation 2.0</a>, to add more than a comment. </p>
<p>When I was <a hREF="http://bangalore.metblogs.com/archives/2007/04/interview_with_mark_of_sf_metr.phtml" target="_window">in Bangalore in 2007</a>, I was struck by the utility of the ubiquitous motorized rickshaws, known locally as autocabs or just autos: <br /> <br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/toobeautiful/463660882/sizes/o/in/set-72157600086322240/"><img src="http://img.metblogs.com/sf/files/2009/02/autorickshaw.jpg" alt="" width="499" height="364" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5249" /></a></p>
<p>Any visitor to Asia has seen these things, since they&#8217;re in every Asian city. And they are <i>cheap</i> and they are <i>everywhere.</i> When I mentioned them to one of the panjandrums of the Bay Area public transportation scene, the executive director of one of the NGOs that lobbies for transportation policy, he was dismissive. &#8220;Oh, the tuk-tuks,&#8221; he said. &#8220;They clog up the streets, and they pollute. That&#8217;s not what we need. We need commuter rail that goes everywhere.&#8221; </p>
<p>Oh, fine, Mr. Bay Area Transit Boss! So I&#8217;m on my way to work in the morning. Never mind how I <i>get to</i> the BART station; I take a train across the bay to, say, Ashby. Now that I have alighted at your <a HREF="http://www.flickr.com/photos/momentofinertia/2423800368/" target="_window">gigantor 1970s-era concrete monster BART station</a>, I need to get to work, 2.3 miles away. It&#8217;s too far to walk. I could wait 20 minutes for a bus, and then that bus would take 20 minutes to poke along for the two miles, making my trip to work take over an hour&#8230; And that&#8217;s why I drive every day instead.</p>
<p><span id="more-5246"></span><br />
&nbsp;<br />
Yes, we need rail. It would be great, for example, if there were another BART line running through Oakland and Berkeley, with stops at the Grand Lake cinema, College and Telegraph, Sather Gate, North Gate, and the Gourmet Ghetto &#8212; call it the Yuppie line, and color it pink. It will be great when we have electrified CalTrain (target: 2015), and a bullet train from L.A. to downtown S.F. (target: 2018), and the <a hREF="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/20/BAE0V5482.DTL" target="_window">Central Subway</a> (target: 2016).</p>
<p>But then what do you <i>do</i> when you get to your stop? What if you have three heavy bags of groceries and live eight blocks up a hill? What if you just live three blocks from a bus line and you&#8217;re old, or injured &#8212; how do you shop? Sure, you could call a taxicab, and wait for twenty minutes, spend five dollars, and have to deal with a pissed-off driver who is mad at you because the short trip hardly registers on the meter and he&#8217;s having enough trouble today making his gate fee &#8212; if he shows up at all &#8212; and who, because he&#8217;s pissed off, won&#8217;t help you with your bags.</p>
<p>And why does it take twenty minutes? Because we&#8217;ll never have enough taxicabs in San Francisco &#8212; the whole issue is too political, and no mayor or public transportation commission has had the political will to fix the <a hREF="http://sf.metblogs.com/2007/02/14/broken-the-taxi-system-in-sf/" target="_window">broken system</a>. We have to have an alternative that works, goes door-to-door (or door-to-transit hub), won&#8217;t take two decades to put in place, and &#8212; extra benefit! &#8212; employs hundreds or thousands of people. </p>
<p>Take the worst part of autorickshaws: they&#8217;re smelly and noisy. Get rid of the smoky two-stroke engine, and electrify the things. On a battery, they&#8217;ve got enough juice to go 35 mph, and that&#8217;s more than enough for city driving. Maybe the driver will have to switch out the batteries once or twice during the day &#8212; fine, put battery switch-out stations all around the city in any of the hundreds of parking lots and vacant storefronts. (You&#8217;ll need the infrastructure eventually for the day <a HREF="http://www.philly.com/philly/classifieds/cars/Electric_car_evangelist_sees_battery-powered_future.html" target="_window">when cars have the same system</a>.) </p>
<p>Now, the other objection: that by being small enough to squeeze between larger vehicles, the autorickshaws contribute to traffic congestion rather than solve it. No &#8212; they&#8217;re going to be replacing cars on the road. Have you ever been to Rainbow Grocery on a busy day or evening? There are cars stretching in a line out of the parking lot, down 13th St., and sometimes around the corner onto Folsom. Since most of the people who shop at Rainbow are hippies or former hippies who would like nothing better than to grasp a green alternative, I&#8217;m betting they&#8217;d jump at the chance to take a less-polluting form of transport to shop. Multiply that by the thousands of shopping trips city residents take every day. Shit, just two days ago I drove one mile from my house in Bernal Heights to 23rd and Mission to pick up fish tacos at La Corneta. I was extremely lucky to find a parking place within a hundred yards, but if I take an autocab, there&#8217;s no need to find a parking place, no need to run my car for the two-mile trip, and now the Mission St. buses can get on their way without my car in the way. Yes, the thousands of autorickshaws would take up space on the roads. But a lot less than the taxis we have now, and a lot less than the cars they&#8217;d replace.</p>
<p>They&#8217;d also get cars off the road by increasing the attractiveness of large public transit systems like BART, because they allow me to get to and from transit hubs easily. </p>
<p>Oh, yes &#8212; I could ride a bicycle to and from BART too. But BART famously <a hREF="http://www.bart.gov/guide/bikes/" target="_window">hates bicycles</a>, banning them from the system during commute hours. I mean, hello!? CalTrain is better; they devote a car to bicycles on many trains, though the car often fills up. And I did ride a bike when I worked at that company 2.3 miles from Ashby BART &#8212; ten years ago. I&#8217;m now 52 years old; frankly, a bicycle is no longer an option for my commute.</p>
<p>So &#8212; I wish we had autorickshaws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sf.metblogs.com/2009/02/01/public-transportation-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
