Comments on: Is Gavin’s Justice Lite Going To Be Justice Served ? http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:13:06 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Jeff Webb http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/comment-page-1/#comment-6785 Jeff Webb Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:53:02 +0000 http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/#comment-6785 and one last little tidbit, or rather a clue as to why some of these speakers are that way, also added at the end of my post about it >> hint > one of the obvious reasons why THC employees would be so arrogant about this is simple. Much of the quality of life 'crimes' would directly affect their own clients in fact, if evictions were a part of that process, much of their buildings would be empty within a few months, and they can't have that and one last little tidbit, or rather a clue as to why some of these speakers are that way, also added at the end of my post about it >>

hint > one of the obvious reasons why THC employees would be so arrogant about this is simple. Much of the quality of life ‘crimes’ would directly affect their own clients

in fact, if evictions were a part of that process, much of their buildings would be empty within a few months, and they can’t have that

]]> By: Jeff Webb http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/comment-page-1/#comment-6784 Jeff Webb Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:23:19 +0000 http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/#comment-6784 Hey Mike, I almost forgot..One person you might want to talk to is Jeoflin Roh about the community courts. He's been involved with it a long time and I know the guy, and he's even interviewed online with Art Bruzzone <a href="http://www.bluoz.com/blog/index.php?/archives/263-Community-Justice-Center.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bluoz.com/blog/index.php?/archives/263-Community-Justice-Center.html</a> I'll bet he can give you more info about it than any of those meetings, and I think he was at this one too, but didn't speak I think the mayor even sent him to New York a couple months ago, but it almost seems to be devolving into messy blob now, possibly because of the very same thing you mentioned, and note that Jeoflin mentions the same THC in that interview Hey Mike, I almost forgot..One person you might want to talk to is Jeoflin Roh about the community courts. He’s been involved with it a long time and I know the guy, and he’s even interviewed online with Art Bruzzone

http://www.bluoz.com/blog/index.php?/archives/263-Community-Justice-Center.html

I’ll bet he can give you more info about it than any of those meetings, and I think he was at this one too, but didn’t speak

I think the mayor even sent him to New York a couple months ago, but it almost seems to be devolving into messy blob now, possibly because of the very same thing you mentioned, and note that Jeoflin mentions the same THC in that interview

]]> By: Lil Mike http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/comment-page-1/#comment-6783 Lil Mike Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:47:18 +0000 http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/#comment-6783 Sorry my article is a pale substitution for your presence, but since whn am I supposed to be a surrogate for your civic involvement? The point of the article is that in my opinion, there was no point of the meeting. We were not informed of much regarding the operations or potential positive/negatives or even neutrals. The dog & pony show of a meeting quickly deteriorated into a pontificating session by two guys from the "SRO Collaborative", and it was hard to get any real solid details or info out from the so-called organizers. By the way, you are welcome to look up info at links I provided in the first of two stories that I posted on the CJC. Perhaps consider attending the next public "Town Hall" session that's supposed to be in April when more details will supposedly be forthcoming. <a href="http://sf.metblogs.com/archives/2008/01/community_justice_center_town.phtml" rel="nofollow">http://sf.metblogs.com/archives/2008/01/community_justice_center_town.phtml</a> Sorry my article is a pale substitution for your presence, but since whn am I supposed to be a surrogate for your civic involvement?

The point of the article is that in my opinion, there was no point of the meeting. We were not informed of much regarding the operations or potential positive/negatives or even neutrals. The dog & pony show of a meeting quickly deteriorated into a pontificating session by two guys from the "SRO Collaborative", and it was hard to get any real solid details or info out from the so-called organizers.

By the way, you are welcome to look up info at links I provided in the first of two stories that I posted on the CJC. Perhaps consider attending the next public "Town Hall" session that’s supposed to be in April when more details will supposedly be forthcoming.

http://sf.metblogs.com/archives/2008/01/community_justice_center_town.phtml

]]> By: mcas http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/comment-page-1/#comment-6782 mcas Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:01:35 +0000 http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/#comment-6782 Thanks to your post, I know no more about the potential impacts- positive or negative- the CJC may have because you chose to complain about how two people spoke at a public meeting and chose to turn the entire 2nd half of your post to criticizing them, rather than talking about the issue of the post's title or any important topic. Informative, really... Thanks to your post, I know no more about the potential impacts- positive or negative- the CJC may have because you chose to complain about how two people spoke at a public meeting and chose to turn the entire 2nd half of your post to criticizing them, rather than talking about the issue of the post’s title or any important topic. Informative, really…

]]> By: mcas http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/comment-page-1/#comment-6781 mcas Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:00:22 +0000 http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/#comment-6781 Thanks to your post, I know no more about the potential impacts- positive or negative- the CJC may have because you chose to complain about how two people spoke at a public meeting and chose to turn the entire 2nd half of your post to criticizing them, rather than talking about the issue of the post's title or any important topic. Informative, really... Thanks to your post, I know no more about the potential impacts- positive or negative- the CJC may have because you chose to complain about how two people spoke at a public meeting and chose to turn the entire 2nd half of your post to criticizing them, rather than talking about the issue of the post’s title or any important topic. Informative, really…

]]> By: jeff http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/comment-page-1/#comment-6780 jeff Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:36:30 +0000 http://sf.metblogs.com/2008/01/16/is-gavins-justice-lite-going-to-be-justice-served/#comment-6780 ah that's just perfect. Made a post on me blog about it and I've seen this before. Come to think of it, Lil Mike, I think last year you made another post when the Club Six fiasco was going on and one of the meetings had yet another THC employee who said something like 'they're clients look like yuppies, and we don't want those kind of people here' I found out later who that was ah that’s just perfect. Made a post on me blog about it and I’ve seen this before.

Come to think of it, Lil Mike, I think last year you made another post when the Club Six fiasco was going on and one of the meetings had yet another THC employee who said something like ‘they’re clients look like yuppies, and we don’t want those kind of people here’

I found out later who that was

]]>